Enterprise sales can take six months to a year, and 5 to 10 stakeholders in a buying committee must come together before making a purchase decision. Single-touch attribution models treat these long, complex journeys like quick decisions, neglecting the journey itself. That approach doesn’t fit how B2B sales actually work.

First, it’s important to see why most attribution models miss the mark in B2B SaaS. Knowing the problem helps you choose a model that works.

What Single-Touch Attribution Could Cost Your B2B SaaS Business

Most analytics platforms default to last-click attribution. It gives all the credit to the final touchpoint before a lead converts. While that may work for quick e-commerce sales, it does not make the mark for SaaS deals with long sales cycles.

If your CFO looks at last-click data, paid search will seem to drive all results because prospects often click a branded ad right before requesting a demo. The content strategy, which covered three highly contested pillars and nurtured the lead for months, shows no impact. Webinars that educated the buying committee look useless. As a result, the budget shifts away from content and toward bottom-funnel tactics.

A few months later, the pipeline slows down. Without investment in awareness, fewer leads enter the funnel.

First-touch attribution places all the weight on the opposite side of the attribution see-saw by giving awareness campaigns too much credit. This eventually results in key nurturing and sales-enablement content that accelerates deal velocity being ignored in your attribution. Where does that leave your customer success team that churned out case studies with tailored messaging for late-stage buyers? Well, their work and the impact of the content may come across as Invisible.

It’s clear that neither model can map or attribute credit to the multiple channels that buying committees interact with. Different stakeholders need different content, whether technical, educational, or, finally, financial, to make a final decision. A model that credits only one touchpoint misses all this complexity.

The Best Multi-Touch Attribution Model for B2B SaaS

There’s no one-size-fits-all model for B2B SaaS. For starters, finding the right model depends on your sales cycle length, the number of channels in your go-to-market, and the size of the buying committee.Let’s focus on sales cycle length to help you whittle down the options.

For SaaS companies with sales cycles exceeding 60 days, the W-shaped attribution model may be your go-to. When set up correctly, it gives you the clearest view of what drives results throughout different key moments in the customer journey:

Why does this structure work for SaaS?

It aligns with the funnel stages that marketing teams control and identifies the hand-off to sales before closing revenue. With the W-shaped model in place, you can identify and later measure the impact of your awareness content, how you drive lead creation with landing pages and gated assets, and, finally, how you close deals with sales enablement materials and nurture sequences.

Long story short, W-shaped attribution shows you which channels move prospects from click to close. This visibility not only helps you make better budget decisions, but also helps you understand which campaigns are performing and which ones need to be cut or optimized.

When to Consider Alternatives

W-Shaped attribution is not always the best fit. Some situations call for other models, such as:

Time Decay works better for sales cycles converting in a shorter time frame of 45 days or less. This model gives progressively more credit to recent touchpoints. If your average deal closes within six weeks and recency matters most, time decay captures that reality. If your attribution solution supports running two models simultaneously, pairing a first-touch model to measure and test your awareness channels could be a winning combination.

U-Shaped serves companies that have pinpointed their customers’ behavior and are looking to optimize their top-of-funnel awareness channels and touchpoints at the bottom of the funnel. This model splits credit between first touch (40%) and lead creation (40%), with 20% distributed across everything else. If you’re selling primarily to SMBs with smaller buying committees and don't have robust tracking, sending data to your CRM can be a reasonable middle ground.

Data-driven models use machine learning to assign credit, but they require substantial data to perform well. Unless you have thousands of prospects and over 300 conversions each month, these models will not be reliable and may prove to be an expensive black box. Most B2B SaaS companies don’t require such a sophisticated model.

Multi-Touch Attribution Model Comparison

No single model works for every business. Here is how common models perform in B2B:

Models You Should Avoid as a B2B SaaS

As explained above, single-touch models won’t be able to trace the B2B customer journey. Don’t blindside your marketing decisions with the following models:

Last-click attribution gives all the credit to bottom-funnel channels and neglects the huge impact of nurturing content. Your B2B prospects don’t convert right away. They’re researching, comparing, and finally coming to your company when they’ve probably already made a decision. Not being able to document their research is hampering your ability to optimize that process.

First-click attribution, like last-touch, ignores the meat and potatoes of the journey and gives credit to only one side of the funnel. Your content, made to educate and reassure clients, gets no credit.

How to Implement Multi-Touch Attribution in Your CRM

Understanding which model works best is nice, but you need to see how you can get started. Here’s a how-to on setting up attribution in Salesforce and HubSpot.

Setting Up Attribution in Salesforce

Salesforce offers many ways to start using attribution, with Campaign Influence as the most widely used method, offering a built-in multi-touch solution. To enable it, go to Setup, search for Campaign Influence, and turn on the Customizable Campaign Influence feature.

Then, you’ll have to decide which has more influence on revenue by assigning more or less weight to different campaign member statuses. For example, attending an event might count more than opening an email. Demo requests should have more weight than content downloads. Set these weights to match your sales process.

Key limitation: Unfortunately, manual work is required. You’ll need to link campaign influence to opportunities using reports. Once linked, you can start building dashboards to show which campaigns and channels influence the pipeline. From here, you can keep an eye on both marketing-sourced and marketing-influenced revenue.

Setting Up Attribution in HubSpot

HubSpot Attribution Reports are available to teams with Marketing Hub Professional and higher. Head over to Reports, then choose Attribution Reports in the report builder to get started.

HubSpot provides multiple prebuilt models, including linear, W and U-shaped, time decay, first-touch, and last-touch. Select the model that best matches your needs and apply it to revenue or deal data.

Key limitation: Their position-based option approximates a U-shaped but doesn’t incorporate opportunity creation as a separate milestone. Sophisticated B2B teams often supplement HubSpot’s native reporting with dedicated attribution platforms.

Both CRMs provide starting points. Purpose-built attribution tools go further by offering cookieless tracking, deeper revenue connections, and models designed specifically for complex B2B journeys.

Attribution’s Blind Spots: The Dark Funnel Reality

Despite offering the basics, CRM attribution tools cannot track every touchpoint, and currently lack the ability to track interactions on key channels like LinkedIn. Then there’s the dark funnel reality that every marketing team faces.

Going even further into the untrackable, prospects might hear about your product in Slack, get a recommendation from a peer, or hear your brand on a podcast and look you up weeks later. LinkedIn direct messages drive interest that won’t ever show in your tracking.

This dark funnel is a big part of B2B buying. That’s why you can’t solely rely on your attribution model to get to see what’s driving interest. This is especially true at the awareness stage.

You’ll need to combine attribution data with qualitative feedback. Asking leads and clients 'How did you hear about us?' in demo forms and sales calls. Sending surveys to closed-won customers about their buying process will give you eye-opening answers, to say the least. You think you got it all figured out, but you can’t see where 100% of the funnel is coming from.

Attribution data gives you direction, not certainty. Self-reported feedback reports confirm what’s really driving the pipeline to sales. Make use of both to make better decisions rather than relying on the mythical one-size-fits-all attribution solution.

Justifying Marketing Spend with Attribution Data

Attribution reports are only useful if executives understand them. Explain insights in terms your CFO cares about to protect your budget.

Focus on metrics that connect marketing activity to revenue outcomes:

Pipeline Influence by Channel shows the dollar value each source drives. Saying 'Content marketing influenced $2.4M in pipeline' is more meaningful than 'Blog traffic increased 23%."

Marketing-Sourced Revenue comes from deals started by marketing. Marketing-Influenced Revenue shows deals that marketing helped move forward. Both are important. Influenced revenue shows how marketing speeds up sales on deals from other sources.

Cost Per Attributed Opportunity (CPAO) will show how efficient your funnel or individual channels are by dividing the cost by the number of attributed opportunities. This calculation could help you avoid doubling down on a channel with a seemingly reasonable CAC but few real opportunities.

Present attribution as marketing’s risk management system to leadership. Without the attribution system in place, you are guessing how to spend; with it, you're showing why you should move budget from weak channels to those that drive an efficient pipeline at the right cost. That’s how you build trust with leadership.

Don’t rely on vanity metrics. If you can't show how MQLs lead to revenue, you won’t make the grade. That’s a different issue that customer journey tracking can help you with to see where they drop off, so you can start working to keep them moving through the funnel.  The pressing issue your CFO needs to address is how to justify your budget requests. Make sure every metric ties back to revenue, and keep the underlying marketing metrics separate.

Key Takeaways

If you sell B2B SaaS with complex buying journeys and need to document the awareness, lead creation, and final close events, W-Shaped attribution gives you the clearest view of what drives your pipeline and closed revenue.

Where you should start:

1. Audit your current attribution model and see its weaknesses in tracing the events in the buyer journey that are important for your organization. Ask yourself, is data from every channel being considered?
2. How clean is your CRM? Ensure that contact information, such as contact roles, is assigned in Salesforce. In any CRM, keeping your data up to date is essential.
3. Implement W-Shaped attribution in your CRM or through a dedicated platform. Credit first touch, lead creation, and opportunity creation as distinct milestones.
4. Add self-reported attribution to the equation to get a dose of reality. Ask prospects how they found you, and compare it to the initial lead source. This will give you an outside perspective on how you drive awareness.
5. Report on pipeline and revenue influence, not vanity metrics. Create a dedicated dashboard for your CFO to monitor.

The perfect attribution tool doesn’t exist. There are too many variables to track in the B2B buyer journey. Stop thinking it’s your responsibility to justify every dollar spent; it’s not! However, you're expected to know with a high degree of certainty which channels drive pipeline changes, which blind spots you need to seek feedback to measure, and how to manage budget conversations so you can give your team the credibility to scale.

The good news is that you have the tools to put a system in place that works for you and your organization.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should own the management of an attribution model?

The responsibility usually falls squarely on marketing, as they have the most trouble justifying the impact of their efforts. In some organizations, CROs responsible for marketing and sales alignment select the right attribution system to highlight everyone’s revenue-driving efforts. Either way, it’s a tool that should be leveraged to keep everyone abreast of KPIs that matter most to them. That’s why personalized dashboards make quite a difference.

Is my data ready to leverage in a multi-touch attribution system?

Without accurate data and a centralized source of campaign performance data from our marketing channels, your attribution system won’t be of any help. Marketing intelligence solutions that recover and centralize performance data and content interactions will give you the data foundation you need to start building an accurate attribution system. Issues can also stem from a lack of standardized naming conventions, mismanagement of lifecycle stages, and sales teams not properly assigning roles or documenting all their interactions in the CRM.

‍